Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    StockNews24StockNews24
    Subscribe
    • Shares
    • News
      • Featured Company
      • News Overview
        • Company news
        • Expert Columns
        • Germany
        • USA
        • Price movements
        • Default values
        • Small caps
        • Business
      • News Search
        • Stock News
        • CFD News
        • Foreign exchange news
        • ETF News
        • Money, Career & Lifestyle News
      • Index News
        • DAX News
        • MDAX News
        • TecDAX News
        • Dow Jones News
        • Eurostoxx News
        • NASDAQ News
        • ATX News
        • S&P 500 News
      • Other Topics
        • Private Finance News
        • Commodity News
        • Certificate News
        • Interest rate news
        • SMI News
        • Nikkei 225 News1
    • Carbon Markets
    • Raw materials
    • Funds
    • Bonds
    • Currency
    • Crypto
    • English
      • العربية
      • 简体中文
      • Nederlands
      • English
      • Français
      • Deutsch
      • Italiano
      • Português
      • Русский
      • Español
    StockNews24StockNews24
    Home » A 67% forecast annual earnings growth but down 19%, is this FTSE 250 defence stock a great short-term risk/long-term reward play?
    News

    A 67% forecast annual earnings growth but down 19%, is this FTSE 250 defence stock a great short-term risk/long-term reward play?

    userBy user2025-10-21No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Image source: Getty Images

    Shares in FTSE 250 defence firm QinetiQ (LSE: QQ) are down 19% from their 6 June 12-month traded high of £5.78.

    I think much of this reflects ongoing market uncertainty arising from the firm’s 17 March trading update. This highlighted delays in short-term contracts in its UK Intelligence sector and its Global Solutions business (primarily in the US).

    At that point, QinetiQ revised its full fiscal year 2025/26 organic revenue growth forecast down to 2%, with an underlying margin of around 10%. These figures also included the effect of £25m–£30m in one-off charges.

    Before this, it had projected high single-digit organic revenue growth and an underlying margin above 12%.

    Adding recent bearish pressure on the stock was the downgrading of the stock to Hold from Buy by broker Kepler Cheuvreux. The short-term risks cited were the same as those earlier highlighted by QinetiQ. However, the brokerage added that the stock is likely to recover in H2.

    Longer-term outlook

    I regard the full standard investment cycle as 30 years. This would cover starting to invest around the age of 20 and looking to retire around the age of 50.

    Given this, as a long-term investor (after several years as a senior investment bank trader), I always loved short-term risks. They often meant the ability to pick up fundamentally solid stocks on the cheap that would recover relatively quickly and perform strongly over time.

    In QinetiQ’s case, the business fundamentals look very sound to me — and to other analysts.

    The consensus forecast is that the firm’s earnings will increase by a whopping 67.4% annually to end-fiscal year 2027/28. And it is growth here that powers any firm’s stock price over the long term.

    What’s the price-to-valuation gap?

    In my experience, asset prices tend to converge to their ‘fair value’ over time. This value reflects several business fundamentals, including earnings growth. And this is reflected in cash flow forecasts for any firm.

    The best way I have found to ascertain any stock’s fair value is the discounted cash flow method. This highlights where any share price should be, based on cash flow forecasts for the underlying business.

    In QinetiQ’s case, it shows the shares are 43% undervalued at their current £4.70 price. Therefore, their fair value is £8.25.

    Secondary confirmations from comparisons of key stock measures with its peers confirm this undervaluation.

    For example, on the key price-to-sales ratio, it trades joint bottom of its competitor group at only 1.2. These companies comprise Babcock at 1.2, BAE Systems at 2.1, Chemring at 2.9, and Rolls-Royce at 4.9.

    My investment view

    Given these factors, I believe QinetiQ is a short-term risk/long-term reward play.

    However, I already own two other stocks in the defence sector – BAE Systems, and Rolls-Royce. Adding another would unsettle the overall balance of my portfolio.

    So if I wanted to buy QinetiQ then I would have to sell one of these two. However, both have been performing extremely well, and I do not want to tinker with that.

    For other investors though, I think the firm is well worth considering.



    Source link

    Share this:

    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X

    Like this:

    Like Loading...

    Related

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleHow much do you need in a Stocks and Shares ISA to aim for a £250-a-week retirement income?
    Next Article Around 87p now, Vodafone’s share price looks cheap to me anywhere under £2.13
    user
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Why the Rolls-Royce share price fell in October

    2025-11-03

    How much do you need in an ISA to aim for monthly passive income of over £1,000?

    2025-11-03

    Should I buy Meta stock for my ISA after a 14% fall?

    2025-11-03
    Add A Comment

    Leave a ReplyCancel reply

    © 2025 StockNews24. Designed by Sujon.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    %d